Yesterday I wrote about a Globe and Mail article by Rob Carrick. I should have pointed out it appeared in their on-line edition. Today’s print edition carries a revised copy of the article.
After reading the article yesterday I emailed the author who was kind enough to reply that my comments were fair. In my email I objected to speaking about Seg Funds as if they were the same thing as Principal Protected Notes. You know, of course, they resemble mutual funds, not PPN’s.
I am pleased to be able to say today the print edition of Mr. Carrick’s column was revised to delete the incorrect information about Seg Funds. You can read the print edition by following this link.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080122.RCARRICK22/TPStory/TPBusiness/?query=